chrislang

I'm a researcher and activist. Working with the World Rainforest Movement.


archive | random | contact | facebook | twitter | delicious


In today’s Independent newspaper (London, Monday 23 February) I argue that we may need to accept some new nuclear power stations. I put forward the view that the trench warfare between the pro-nuclear groups and those that support renewables means that progress towards ‘decarbonising’ electricity generation in the UK is too slow. We probably need to invest in many different types of non fossil-fuel generation as rapidly as we can if we are to meet the tough targets for UK emissions reduction so painfully won by groups such as Friends of the Earth. We no longer have the luxury of ruling out nuclear expansion. (via Carbon Commentary · Why might nuclear be necessary?)

In today’s Independent newspaper (London, Monday 23 February) I argue that we may need to accept some new nuclear power stations. I put forward the view that the trench warfare between the pro-nuclear groups and those that support renewables means that progress towards ‘decarbonising’ electricity generation in the UK is too slow. We probably need to invest in many different types of non fossil-fuel generation as rapidly as we can if we are to meet the tough targets for UK emissions reduction so painfully won by groups such as Friends of the Earth. We no longer have the luxury of ruling out nuclear expansion. (via Carbon Commentary · Why might nuclear be necessary?)


| tags nuclear | 20 Mar 2009 | comments (view)


Climate Camp - Porritt & Monbiot on BBC Newsnight, 5th August 2008: Part 2 (childoflewin)


| tags monbiot | nuclear | coal | porritt | 01 Sep 2008 | comments (view)


Climate Camp - BBC Newsnight report, 5th August 2008: Part 1 (childoflewin)


| tags monbiot | nuclear | coal | 01 Sep 2008 | comments (view)




“I feel I need to point out that I have not become an advocate for nuclear power. My position is that environmentalists should stop trying to pick technologies for electricity generation. Instead we should demand a maximum level for the carbon dioxide produced per megawatt-hour, impose a number of other public safety measures, then allow the energy companies to find the cheapest means of delivering it. Otherwise we are in danger of backing the solutions we find aethestically appealing and delaying the massive carbon cuts that need to be made. If nuclear power meets the very tough conditions I proposed last week, we should no longer oppose it; though that remains a big if. This is too subtle a point for Arthur and other commentators, who are shrieking that Monbiot has gone nuclear.”

| tags monbiot | nuclear | coal | 12 Aug 2008 | comments (view)


“As many as 237 reactors may be built globally by 2030, an average of more than 10 a year, according to the World Nuclear Association in London. That compares with 78, or fewer than four a year, started since the 1986 Chernobyl meltdown in Ukraine.”

| tags nuclear | 14 Mar 2008 | comments (view)